Global Development: Views from the Center

 

Kolbe’s Decision to Leave Congress a Loss for Development

November 28, 2005


Rep. Jim KolbeCongressman Jim Kolbe’s surprise pre-Thanksgiving announcement that he will not seek re-election in 2006 represents a real loss for those of us who work to improve U.S. policies towards developing countries. An eleven-term Republican representing southern Arizona, Kolbe has been a rare and effective voice of reason on foreign aid.


As chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign Operations he helped to make the case for the Bush Administration’s innovative aid program, the Millennium Challenge Account but he was also frank about the broader problems of the U.S.’s highly fragmented and poorly administered aid programs . Congressman Kolbe was also an early and wise proponent of the U.S. incorporating prevention of state collapse into its strategy for dealing with the world’s more than 50 weak and failing states (an issue that CGD addressed in our 2004 report, On the Brink: Weak States and US National Security)
I am struck that media reports of Congressman Kolbe’s decision neglect his extensive work on development issues—despite the fact that many in the development community regard him as something of a hero. That’s perhaps symptomatic of the challenges that he surely faced in Congress and in his district in making the case for a sound U.S. development policy. But the media reports do capture some of the personal qualities that made Congressman Kolbe’s work on development so effective. As the Arizona Daily Star noted:

In an era when reasonable discourse in Washington has given way to venomous bombast, Kolbe had become an anachronism – a soft-spoken congressman who brought thoughtfulness and intelligence to the job.

  AddThis Social Bookmark Button


3 Responses to “Kolbe’s Decision to Leave Congress a Loss for Development”

  1. I am stunned to hear this. I had a lot of confidence in his judgment. What a loss. sierra

  2. Congressman Kolbe’s departure is absolutely a loss on the development policy front. And, sadly, with his departure also went the departure of his super-bright and reasonable staffer, Sean Mulvaney, whose knowledge and insights on a more effective U.S. foreign assistance strategy were hugely helpful to our work. Sadly, for development, Sean’s new job does not cover our issues. All the best to them both in their new pursuits!

  3. Big bummer. I hope we can all do something nice for Mr. Kolbe (and Sean).

Post a Comment

We value frank and constructive exchanges and encourage you to use your real name in your comments.