Global Development: Views from the Center
« John Kenneth Galbraith, 1908-2006 | Main | The NY Times asks: How much is toilet paper in Zimbabwe? »
May 01, 2006
Does globalization help or hurt the poor?
Posted by Owen Barder at 11:08 PM
Pranab Bardhan writes in Scientific American about whether globalization helps or hurts the world's poor. He writes that the macro evidence is ambiguous, but gives micro examples of how globalisation has benefited individual communities, though the transition can be wrenching.
He highlights the complexity of the problem:
In 1993, anticipating a U.S.
ban on imports of products made using child labor, the garment industry
in Bangladesh dismissed an estimated 50,000 children. UNICEF and local
aid groups investigated what happened to them. About 10,000 children
went back to school, but the rest ended up in much inferior
occupations, including stone breaking and child prostitution. That does
not excuse the appalling working conditions in the sweatshops, let
alone the cases of forced or unsafe labor, but advocates must recognize
the severely limited existing opportunities for the poor and the
possible unintended consequences of "fair trade" policies.
Bardhan is optimistic about the emergence of greater coordination among transnational companies,
multilateral organizations, developing country governments and local
aid groups on programs to help the poor. He discusses six possible measures to help share the benefits of globalization more equitably:
- short term capital controls to protect financial stability
- reduced protectionism by rich countries, especially on agriculture and textiles;
- trust busting - in particular, to prevent collustion to fix international commodity prices;
- social programs, particularly to help countries to adapt to change
- research, including for pharmaceuticals and agricultural products.
- greater immigration into rich countries, which he says would do more to reduce world poverty than
other forms of international integration, such as trade liberalization,
can.
Simplistic antiglobalization slogans or sermons on the unqualified
benefits of free trade do not serve the cause of alleviating world
poverty. An appreciation of the complexity of the issues and an active
interweaving of domestic and international policies would be decidedly
more fruitful.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
/mt/mt-tb.cgi/400
Comments
two related posts;
http://truckandbarter.com/mt/archives/2006/04/fact_attack_on.html
http://truckandbarter.com/mt/archives/2006/05/politician_proo.html
Posted by: Paul at May 3, 2006 12:31 AM

