Global Development: Views from the Center
« How Much Aid for Africa? This model won't tell you! | Main | New poll finds Africans increasingly disenchanted with democracy »
May 25, 2006
Nurse Drain A Problem? Think Again.
Posted by Michael Clemens at 08:25 AM
The effect of nurse emigration on the countries of origin is not that simple, despite yesterday's somber New York Times piece, "U.S. Plan to Lure Nurses May Hurt Poor Nations." Yes, the Philippines has been the world's top exporter of nurses for decades, but today it has more nurses than almost any other country in its income group. According to the World Health Organization (PDF), it actually has more nurses per capita than Great Britain. Why? Because there is no such thing as a fixed quantity of nurses to be "drained" from the Philippines or Africa, like petroleum from the ground. People -- in this case mostly low-income women -- react to global markets and change their career plans accordingly. Many Filipinas wouldn't have become nurses if not for the migration opportunity, and thus are not 'lost' in any sense when they depart. Africans are starting to follow suit, opening career paths for professional women who would otherwise have few. This should not be discouraged through closed immigration policy, but rather taken advantage of -- through the establishment of for-export nurse training programs as the Philippines has done en masse. Unlike petroleum, these women are human beings. They have rights and ambitions whose fruition in the United States is a beautiful thing.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
/mt/mt-tb.cgi/446
Comments
Dean Baker pointed out this article too, with a slightly different take.
Posted by: Todd at May 25, 2006 11:17 AM
I would assume that, esp. for poor people, the state must subsidize nursing training. If nurses then emigrate, unless they send back money which is then taxed to recoup costs, it seems like the state will lose out. Now, are foreign earnings generally taxed? Probably not, although once the incoming funds are circulating through the economy, some are taxed. Any studies on this?
Posted by: c gilbert at May 26, 2006 07:22 PM
Also, what's the explanation for the failure of schools here to supply enough training to meet the demand (150,000 U.S. applicants rejected because of lack of training slots.) By having training happen de facto in 3rd world countries, won't that further depress teacher wages here and not increase training supply? I know the poor people of 3rd world countries need all the opportunity they can get, but shouldn't we provide training for those who want it in the U.S.? Is it reasonable for those here to arrange to move overseas to get training? What we are saying here is that labor should be allowed (which means 'required' in the end) to move wherever it wants.
What's the solution?
Posted by: c gilbert at May 26, 2006 07:32 PM
Mr. Clemens is right. In the Philippines now, many career people shift to nursing so they can easily be hired in the US, Canada and UK. Physicians and doctors, engineers and architects, lawyers and managers, teachers and civil servants, among others, have shifted career, studied nursing, passed the nursing board exams, and waited for their turn to be hired abroad.
The supply of nursing students have greatly increased, and the number of private colleges and universities, as well as private hospitals offering BS nursing, have also increased. There will be no "under-supply" in the nursing and health professionals in the Philippines as there is a steady stream of new students and other professionals shifting career to the health sector. Although admittedly, there are some short-term problems, like large-scale exodus of experienced nurses and doctors from provincial hospitals, creating an immediate "vacuum" of experienced health professionals in some parts of the country.
But there are also short-term and immediate gains, like ever-increasing remittances of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) back to their families. Total remittances via official financial channels in 2005 was $10.7 billion, and estimated remittances via friends and other unofficial channels is at least $3 billion more. This year 2006, projected remittances will reach $12 billion, or an average of $1 billion a month, excluding several billion $ of remittances via friends and unofficial channels.
In addition, some sick and well-off people in rich countries who get impatient with protectionism of their countries by limiting the entry of foreign nurses, doctors and other health professionals, come to the Philippines' many hospitals and private clinics for medical treatment and check-ups. This phenomenon is now called "medical tourism", and there are a number of local and foreign entrepreneurs wanting to cash in on this emerging phenomenon.
Posted by: Nonoy Oplas at June 20, 2006 11:19 PM

