The U.S. Dilemma over How to Help Zimbabwe: Some Ideas from My Congressional Testimony
September 30, 2009
Zimbabwe is not only a problem for all of Africa, it’s a vexing dilemma for U.S policymakers. Some facts:
- Morgan Tsvangirai won the March 2008 elections and should rightfully be president
- Robert Mugabe and Tsvangirai are now partners in a shaky unity government forced on them (but not really enforced) by their neighbors
- Mugabe’s men, responsible for the vicious campaign of violence and for destroying the economy, are still in positions of power
- The deeply flawed unity government has, despite itself, made some real progress and for now is the only game in town
The tough question for outsiders: How do you support Zimbabwe’s recovery and reconstruction while not emboldening the parts of the unity government that unleashed brutality and mayhem? That is the very question tackled at today’s Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on African Affairs hearing.
Thanks to Chairman Feingold for asking me to offer suggestions. Here is my full (3-pages only!) testimony. My recommendations at this time are to: 1) Keep targeted sanctions on. 2) Push the region, especially South Africa, to live up to their responsibilities. 3) Find creative ways to help restart critical public services while guarding against any money leaking into the hands of Mugabe’s agents.
This last one is tricky but perhaps not as hard as it may sound. Sure, the central bank stole $7 million from the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria last year. But we can use special accounts and contractors to cut out the central bank and ensure the money goes where it should. Some suggestions to tap into existing U.S. pipelines and expertise:
- Designate Zimbabwe a “focus country” for PEPFAR and PMI
- Include Zimbabwe in the White House food security initiative…whatever that really turns out to be. (Zim has 3 million food insecure people this year.)
- Push OPIC and ExIm to re-open facilities for private capital (e.g. a Zimbabwe Enterprise Fund, like OPIC has in Liberia)
- Make a modest contribution to the World Bank’s special Zimbabwe trust fund and encourage the bank to be forward-leaning
Any other good ideas out there?
One interesting outcome already from today’s hearing: The South African parliament has never had a debate on Zimbabwe policy. While this seems both stunning and outrageous, today’s U.S. Senate hearing may actually help to change that. A prominent member of parliament (and the Democratic Alliance’s representative on the SADC parliamentary forum) issued this statement noting today’s event and calling for a debate on the floor. If it happens, kudos to Senator Feingold for not just moving U.S. policy along, but also encouraging the South Africans to reassess their stance.
8 Responses to “The U.S. Dilemma over How to Help Zimbabwe: Some Ideas from My Congressional Testimony”
Post a Comment
We value frank and constructive exchanges and encourage you to use your real name in your comments.






October 2nd, 2009 at 8:43 am
Above is a link to the website of my church, where my husband & I head a grass-roots organization that supports one small group of people in Kuwadzana, Zimbabwe. Our sister church in Kuwadzana has the only preschool in the city where the children receive lunch and two snacks each day, and this is what we give to support. When we have larger efforts such as our recent walk for Zimbabwe, the church there is also able to buy food for several of the poor families in the area. Also, a young couple from our church has recently moved to Kuwadzana to teach a new method of farming so that people can become self-sustaining in the next few years.
In light of the sticky political problems inherent in most aid organizations, including governmental aid, I believe this type of grass-roots connection may be the only way to help the people of Zimbabwe for now–the donations are small enough to stay under Mugabe’s radar, but large enough and consistent enough to do some good for those supported.
I would urge those in our government who truly wish to help Zimbabwe to encourage churches and civic organizations in making and maintaining one-to-one connections such as we enjoy with the Kuwadzana Presbyterian Church.
Thank you for NOT forgetting Zimbabwe!
Melody S. Nadeau
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:43 am
If the concern is how to support Zimbabwean recovery without bolstering the individuals responsible for its demise, then why not limit direct assistance to the Zimbabwean unity government (until Tsangvirai and his associates gain a better foothold)? Instead of running the risk of aid falling into the wrong hands, why not empower the NGO’s who have a track record of results in the midst of the chaos of the past decade? This may seem simplistic and I’ll admit that I’m not sure how to accomplish this logistically, but it seems like a reasonable plan for the time being.
October 5th, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Very good new statement from Senator Feingold today: http://feingold.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=318622
October 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
I very much agree with your call to expand Pepfar’s funding of HIV/AIDS programs in Zimbabwe. Unfortunately, it is hard to see how Pepfar will do that if, as expected, the Obama Administration continues to propose dramatic reductions in the pace of funding for Pepfar, based on a flawed cost-effectiveness analysis.
October 7th, 2009 at 11:39 am
Zimbabwe is a deeply traumatized society. Interim measures should also include assistance to peacebuilding, trauma healing and community dialog on national values, the constitution, and the future. There is a participatory history with the National Constitutional Assembly and in my view the povo and especially the many victims of violence want their stories to be heard before amnesty or reconciliation. There is much that could be done to support on-going local initiatives.
October 8th, 2009 at 2:13 am
The people of Zimbabwe are largely aware of the failurers of Mugabe’s past government. We are equally aware that his cronies want to exploit the current stable political environment to further enrich themselves. We know very well that we can hardly isolate them from benefiting from any outside support directly or indirectly. Given this dilemma, it becomes very crucial to be rightly focused. Lets go ahead andd help the needy. Lets minimise the extent to which the cronies benefit by exploring ways of sending support direct to the people. At the same time we should keep on supporting efforts by the current government. As i said, people do recognise that its not Zanu Pf but the progressive MDC which is making this possible.
November 18th, 2009 at 6:41 am
The Zimbabwean crisis must be taken seriously.The people of Zimbabwe have suffered for too long and its high time the international community should call a spade a spade.Mugabe gas too much power and is not willing to share it with anyone.The so called unity government is meant to empower Mugabe and his party.It is a shacky arragement with a sole purpose of enriching ZANU PF.The only way forward is to facillitate free and fair elections and let justice and democracy prevail, nothing less and nothing more.I appreciate the work of the president of Botswana Seretse Khama Ian Khama and the late president of Zambia Levy Mwanawasa who have been very vocal in denouncing the evils perpetrated by the Mugabe regime.We just hope one day light will shine in Zimbabwe.
March 22nd, 2010 at 4:16 pm
With or without Zanu Pf or MDC in Zimbabwe, there are fundamental matters to be addressed so that the country gets it’s fair share of wealth. In the colonial era natural resources where looted by USA and Britain and there came independence 1980, the looting still continued with the aid of Robert Gabriel Mugabe. Now Mugabe is looting without his partners namely, the United States of America and Britain, partners in evil, they should fight their own war. The only unfortunate element is Morgan Tsvangirai who does not understand the rule of the game, as a result he is befriended by hawlks and hyenas, namely USA and Britain. In his small mind he thinks they care, and he also thinks the people of Zimbabwe want jobs. He sounds like the Jim Reeves music record stuck at some point. He lacks the vision Zimbabweans want, if hunger is done away with what next? His little brain tells him that the British and Americans want to improve Zimbabwean life to world class. It’s unfortunate that he worked on a mine and could not see how the environment is destroyed and local people left poorer than they were. Tsangirayi, should know that self governance must cover all aspects of the well being of a nation. Correct! Mugabe is corrupt, corrupted to the marrow by these same very people Britain and America, next in line is you, your other people started playing the game long ago. MDC party is also corrupt. All reasonable people in Zimbabwe are desperate for a better party which is non existing. The USA is criminal enough to know any ways of delivering food to the suffering masses of Zimbabwe whom they owe big time from slavery days.USA and Britain, the net is closing on you, whether you like it or not, neoliberal globalization!!!, from that to what next? to collision.Wish you the best with your newly born baby M.Tsvangirai and your former headboy Robert Gabriel Mugabe.