David Wheeler

 
David Wheeler
Profile
David Wheeler leads CGD’s Confronting Climate Change Initiative, which includes assessing the stakes for developing countries, integrating climate change into development assistance, and the use of public information disclosure to reduce greenhouse gas pollution. Wheeler is the architect of CGD’s Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA) database, the first global database of power-related CO2 emissions. Other areas of research include natural resource conservation, African infrastructure development, sustainable development indicators and the allocation of development aid.


Full Bio
http://www.cgdev.org/content/expert/detail/11584/

Posts:

 

March 15, 2010

Game Change: A Sudden Shift in the Global Climate Debate

By David Wheeler

Last week, Saurabh Shome and I reported that India’s proposed massive investments in clean power will cost about $50 billion more than generating the same power with coal. As we note in our paper, Less Smoke, More Mirrors, India is considering such investments “despite the absence of any meaningful international pressure to cut emissions, no guarantees of compensatory financing, and a continuing American failure to adopt stringent emissions limits.” With this initiative, India joins China, South Africa, and other industrializing countries that have begun large clean technology programs at their own expense. In the process they have knocked the conventional climate-development debate into a cocked hat. Consider the following contrasts between Old Think and the New Reality. Read More…

1 Comment »

 

December 22, 2009

Godot Actually Made It To Copenhagen … and Nothing Happened. Now What?

By David Wheeler

In the wake of the shambles at Copenhagen, we could do worse than contemplate Vladimir and Estragon in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. The two characters converse endlessly and anxiously, while they wait for the mysterious Godot to arrive and secure their enlightenment. But Godot never shows up, even though he keeps sending word that he will. Read More…

5 Comments »

 

December 18, 2009

Pathetic Outcome in Copenhagen

By David Wheeler

Right – it’s an “agreement”… to punt down the field for some transient face-saving. Obama said he had to fly back to Washington early because of the weather (riiiight ….). These guys have signally failed us. The Americans failed on emissions reductions. The Chinese failed on transparency. Plenty of credit to go around, as it turns out. But the problem doesn’t go away, and efforts to find solutions outside of the failed negotiating framework now become more crucial and urgent than ever. We at CGD will be doing our part. Stay tuned.

And in the meantime, it’s well worth recalling the last stanza of this poem:

The Hollow Men
T.S. Eliot

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

2 Comments »

 

December 15, 2009

Beyond Copenhagen: Making Forest Conservation Credible

By David Wheeler

This is a joint posting with Dan Hammer.

The climate negotiations in Copenhagen have galvanized the climate evangelists and skeptics alike; the talks, some say, are merely a front to assuage the general public, and will only divert attention from the scientific imperative to curb global carbon emissions. But one benefit of the talks has already been realized: They have catalyzed a flurry of activity, especially in the domain of monitoring and evaluation. Last week in Copenhagen, Google.org announced that it will provide free access to raw satellite imagery to facilitate global monitoring of deforestation, which may account for 15% of annual greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, Google.org has partnered with two leading forest scientists to host their image-parsing algorithms online, so that experts in developing countries can produce more accurate maps of forest cover loss from satellite images. Read More…

1 Comment »

 

May 28, 2009

Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade: The Trouble with Offsets

By David Wheeler

This is a joint post with Matt Hoffman.

Carbon offsets — granting rights to emit greenhouse gases beyond a stated ceiling in exchange for contributions to cutting emissions elsewhere — are an important part of the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill now making its way through the U.S. Congress. Offsets have plenty of appeal, but in practice they have a poor track record. And there are less risky, lower cost ways to achieve similar goals. Read More…

1 Comment »

 

April 30, 2009

A Transformational North Africa/Middle East Solar Power Program: Bright Prospect for the Clean Technology Fund

By David Wheeler

This is a joint post with Joel Meister and Matt Hoffman.

North Africa Solar Power MapThe May 11-12th meeting of the Clean Technology Fund’s Trust Fund Committee will consider a proposed $6-8 billion solar thermal power program for North Africa and the Middle East, according to the World Bank’s Climate Investment Funds website. The concept note, Clean Technology Fund: Concept Note for a Concentrated Solar Power Scale-up Program in the Middle East and North Africa Region, cites CGD research on solar radiation potential in the region and is the most encouraging sign yet of CTF stakeholders’ commitment to clean energy development. Read More…

4 Comments »

 

April 21, 2009

Nathalie’s Story: Saving the Mountain Gorillas, and the Planet

By David Wheeler

GorillaMy friend Nathalie Johnson is one of my personal heroes. For the better part of two decades, she has worked tirelessly at the World Bank to conserve biodiversity while promoting sustainable livelihoods for the rural people of Africa. Fiercely proud of being a field biologist in an institution dominated by economists, Nathalie has turned out to be one of the finest applied economists I know. In the early 1990s, she joined a quest to engage the people of southwestern Uganda in a collaborative effort to save the mountain gorillas. Her passion, determination and, not least, common-sense application of economic principles contributed mightily to the development and successful implementation of the Bwindi Impenetrable National Park and Mgahinga Gorilla National Park Conservation Project, financed by the Global Environment Facility, the World Bank, and other donors. In a region where development projects all-too-frequently fail, the Bwindi/Mgahinga Project has been a glowing counter-example. A recent in-depth evaluation concludes that it has halted destruction of the gorillas’ habitat and reversed their slide toward extinction, while promoting local livelihoods. Its lessons are important for biodiversity conservation, and they are also critical for halting the global forest destruction that accounts for over 20% of carbon dioxide emissions. Read More…

Comment »

 

April 10, 2009

Yada Yada…Washington Talks While Missouri Acts on Climate Change

By David Wheeler

You could be forgiven for thinking that national action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is going nowhere. This article in yesterday’s Washington Post describes the persistent hand-wringing inside the Beltway about the putative cost of cap-and-trade regulation. The argument continues although, as I and many others have argued, the U.S. is perfectly capable of implementing a system that would feature a 100% auction of carbon emissions permits from the outset, low initial costs, and compensating rebates to keep energy bills level for working families. Read More…

Comment »

 

April 3, 2009

G-20 to World Bank: Start Carbon Accounting. G-20 to Rich Countries: Pay the Bill

By David Wheeler

Yesterday, the G20 leaders released a statement that commits the World Bank and the other MDB’s to financing low-carbon growth:

We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this objective. Read More…

2 Comments »

 

March 26, 2009

Protectionist Snares Along the Road to Copenhagen

By David Wheeler

Countries importing Chinese goods should be responsible for the heat-trapping gases released during manufacturing, a top Chinese official said yesterday…. “As one of the developing countries, we are at the low end of the production line for the global economy. We produce products, and these products are consumed by other countries…. This share of emissions should be taken by the consumers, but not the producers.”

-Associated Press, March 17, 2009

The Copenhagen climate negotiations have already begun, as the world’s premier carbon emitters try various public gambits to bolster their positions. Consider, for example, the above-quoted statement by China’s top climate negotiator. While it is superficially clever, it will almost certainly backfire if anyone takes it seriously. The argument says, in essence, “We’re already doing you a favor by shipping you industrial goods that you no longer want to produce. So don’t expect us to pay the bill for their carbon emissions as well. You happily consume our offerings, so you should pay for their consequences.”
Read More…

Comment »

 

March 20, 2009

Sunlit Passage toward Reconciliation for the U.S. and Iran?

By David Wheeler

Today, President Obama chose the occasion of Nowruz, the Iranian New Year, to send a conciliatory message to the people and leaders of Iran. A spokesperson for Iranian President Ahmadinejad responded immediately with a positive message.

The stage is set for movement toward rapprochement, but both sides need an appropriate vehicle. Fortunately, we have a perfect candidate: Rapid, collaborative development of solar thermal power in Iran. As Kevin Ummel and I show in our paper Desert Power, the Middle East has enormous potential for solar power development that can achieve cost parity with fossil fuels within a decade. This solar map of Iran shows that more than half the country has enough solar radiation for large-scale production of solar thermal power. Solar thermal facilities in a small portion of the dark-red area could power the whole of Iran indefinitely with a clean, renewable energy source. All things considered, what could better foster US-Iran relations than such a non-nuclear, zero-carbon energy initiative as we move toward the UN climate conference in Copenhagen? 

Read More…

2 Comments »

 

March 2, 2009

Clean Technology for Developing Countries — Bright Road Ahead

By David Wheeler

Solar PanelsI’d like to put last week’s move by the U.S. Congress to eliminate a proposed contribution to the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) in perspective. At the risk of reviving an overworked metaphor from late 20th Century discussions of the Internet: the move was rather like an unexpected pothole on the onramp to what promises to be a clean technology superhighway. Which is to say, despite this setback, I am increasingly optimistic that the U.S. will lead the way to a rich-world agreement with the developing world to cut greenhouse gas emissions. And a fund very much like the CTF will be central to that agreement.

Read More…

3 Comments »

 

February 25, 2009

End of the Road for the World Bank’s Clean Technology Fund?

By David Wheeler

The World Bank's Done it NowWell, the World Bank’s senior management has really done it this time:  As my colleague Joel Meister reported today, Congress has reacted to its intransigence on carbon accounting and coal-fired power by deleting budgetary support for the Bank’s  Clean Technology Fund.  After creating this avoidable breach, the Bank’s management will now have to plead with other donors to stay, while the United States takes its business elsewhere.  The new budget does contain some funding for similar activities in the coming year — $100 million for clean energy promotion by USAID — while the Obama administration seeks other multilateral options.  As I told (subscription required) Lisa Friedman at ClimateWire, the EU and Japan seem unlikely to support the CTF without the United States, so the Bank’s self-described “flagship” program on carbon emissions mitigation seems to be headed for the rocks.

Read More…

3 Comments »

 

January 29, 2009

Upcoming World Bank Vote Threatens Future of Clean Tech Fund

By David Wheeler

This is a joint posting with Joel Meister.

Even as President Obama breaks new ground this week on U.S. environmental policy, an upcoming vote by country members of the World Bank’s Clean Technology Fund Trust Fund Committee may perpetuate business-as-usual policies that subsidize coal-fired power plants and contribute to global warming. On Friday morning, the committee is scheduled to consider and approve investment criteria that include coal-fired power projects among “clean” technologies that are eligible for billions in MDB financing.

Read More…

1 Comment »

 

January 28, 2009

President Obama, the Gang of Ten, and Getting to Yes in Copenhagen

By David Wheeler

President Obama clearly wants to break with his predecessor on energy and climate policy. But the American political divide has not disappeared, and it still threatens to derail the Copenhagen climate negotiations next December. Three developments during the past week highlight both the promise and the peril: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s appointment of Todd Stern to be U.S. special envoy for climate negotiations; President Obama’s reversal of the Bush administration’s refusal to let California and other states set tighter standards for greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles; and the re-emergence of the “Gang of Ten” — Democratic Senators who represent coal-dependent states in the U.S. heartland and fear that cap-and-trade regulation of carbon emissions will harm their constituents.

Read More…

1 Comment »

 

December 22, 2008

Where There Is No Vision, the People Will Refuse to Perish–But Do-Nothing Institutions Very Well Might

By David Wheeler

It’s been a busy year for citizen action on carbon emissions. On September 11, a UK jury considered charges against six Greenpeace activists who tried to shut down the Kingsnorth power station in Kent, UK. Kingsnorth emits 12.8 million tons of CO2 annually — among the top 150 of over 50,000 plants worldwide in our CARMA database. It will vault much higher in the rankings after its planned expansion increases its emissions to 24.8 million tons. The Greenpeace defense rested on preventing climate change that would cause greater damage to property around the world. The court heard from a variety of witnesses, including Jim Hansen, NASA’s top climate scientist, who has repeatedly warned that more CO2 emissions pose a deadly threat.

Read More…

Comment »

 

December 9, 2008

Poznan Redux: The True Climate Cost

By David Wheeler

This is a joint posting with Kevin Ummel
Q: What can we do to save the earth?
Wendell Berry: “Stay put.”
2008 United Nations Framework on Climate Change ConferenceEconomists are always irritating their colleagues by harping about opportunity cost, but the concept can be useful nonetheless. For example, consider the “carbon account” announced for the Poznan climate change meeting. According to the sponsors, travel and other logistics for the 8,000 conference participants will generate 13,000 tons of greenhouse gas emissions.
Participants have duly announced the purchase of “carbon offsets” as atonement for their logistical sins (which begins to sound like the sale of indulgences by the medieval Church, but that’s another story). The whole thing projects a reassuring aura: By purchasing offsets, the participants can cover the “climate cost” of the meeting.

Read More…

1 Comment »

 

December 3, 2008

Poznan, Hot Air, and Carbon Offsets

By David Wheeler

“I have discovered that all human evil comes from this, man’s being unable to sit still in a room.”
– Blaise Pascal
Q: What can we do to save the earth?
Wendell Berry: “Stay put.”
Poznan, two weeks in December: This gabfest will be populated by about 7,900 people who are there for the carnival and maybe 100 people who might conceivably affect meaningful decisions. Their trip to Poznan will be the atmospheric equivalent of running a 50MW coal-fired power plant every day for the two weeks of the conference (specs: 80% capacity factor; 1 ton CO2/MWh). Love those “offsets”…

Read More…

Comment »

 

November 25, 2008

Obama and House Committee Shake-Up Signal Sea Change in U.S. Climate Policy

By David Wheeler

This is a joint posting with Joel Meister
Recent announcements of climate-related transition teams and agency director appointments have provided a wealth of information about the prospects for action on climate change by the Obama White House. Bolstered by changes in the leadership of a crucial House committee, the energy and climate change agenda is likely to be a top legislative priority for the new administration. These changes also suggest that climate policies will affect the strategy for economic recovery, as well as a reorientation of US foreign assistance toward climate-sensitive policies that will yield significant benefits for poor people in developing countries.

Read More…

Comment »

 

November 6, 2008

Smart Obamanomics for the President-Elect’s Top Priority: Energy and Climate Change

By David Wheeler

This is a joint post with Kevin Ummel, Robin Kraft, Joel Meister and Dan Hammer
During the second presidential debate on October 7, an exchange took place that tells us a lot about what to expect from an Obama administration:

Tom Brokaw: Senator Obama, if you would give us your list of priorities, there are some real questions about whether everything can be done at once.
Barack Obama: We’re going to have to prioritize, just like a family has to prioritize … Energy we have to deal with today … So that would be priority number one.

Read More…

6 Comments »