Sheila Herrling

 
Sheila Herrling
Profile
Sheila manages two of CGD's biggest foreign assistance initiatives -- the Modernizing U.S. Foreign Assistance Initiative, a one-stop-shop for policy analysis and advocacy efforts on revitalizing the mission, mandate and organizational structure of U.S. foreign assistance and the Millennium Challenge Account Monitor. She is the principal contributor to the MCA Monitor Blog and a regular contributor to CGD's Views from the Center blog, a co-author with Steve Radelet of U.S. Foreign Assistance for the Twenty-first Century (CGD, 2008) and Round Five Of The MCA: Which Countries Are Most Likely To Be Selected For FY2008? (CGD, 2007).


Full Bio
http://www.cgdev.org/content/expert/detail/4609/

Posts:

 

August 19, 2009

New MCC CEO Ready to Roll?

By Sheila Herrling

This post originally appeared on CGD’s MCA Monitor Blog and also appeared on the Huffington Post.

Word has it that the Administration’s candidate for MCC CEO has cleared the arduous vetting process. That would certainly be good news for the MCC staff who have been waiting 7 months to find out who is going to lead the institution through the next set of reforms and key decisions necessary to help ensure that the promises of an innovative model actually deliver better results that other programs. While I’m sure the Administration would prefer to hold the formal nomination until it can be announced jointly with a USAID Administrator nominee, I hope they won’t. Ditto for the President of OPIC candidate who is apparently also ready (or very close to ready) to roll. As the disappointing process to find a USAID Administrator drags on, I hope the White House will see the wisdom of energizing each and every development agency it can – as soon as it can – by appointing their leads. Each agency need to get moving quickly on putting its own house in order before deliberations can be held on consolidation. And I trust that USAID employees would not read any unintended political signs into the fact that the MCC CEO or the President of OPIC was appointed before their Administrator. We have got to get development back on track, delivering their good to anxiously awaiting customers. Then we can start debating the order of the train cars.

Please submit your comments for the original post here.

Comment »

 

August 7, 2009

The Farmer Out of the Dell: Who’s Next in the USAID Courtship Ritual?

By Sheila Herrling

As others before me have reported, Paul Farmer, the longest-rumored contender for the USAID Administrator nomination, is out of the running. And so begins again a courtship ritual that, funny enough, is captured in the old children’s rhyme that bears his name. Not so funny is the fact that seven months into an administration that ran on a smart power platform promising to elevate development to equal footing with diplomacy and defense, there is still no appointee at the helm of the agency charged with executing U.S. development policy and foreign assistance. (Yeah, yeah, I know the Secretary of State is technically in charge since USAID is a sub-cabinet agency. But as I have said before, she has a full-time job on the diplomacy front and needs a powerful wingman 24/7 on the development front.) Read More…

20 Comments »

 

July 30, 2009

Who’d a Thunk It? Bipartisan Consensus on Foreign Aid

By Sheila Herrling

This is a joint posting with Sarah Jane Staats and also appeared on the Huffington Post

Sheila Herrling and Sara Jane StaatsAmidst of a month of partisan battles on Capitol Hill over a Supreme Court nominee, healthcare and financial regulation, a new bill was introduced this week that rose above party lines: the Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act of 2009 (S. 1524). Senators Kerry, Lugar, Menendez, Corker, Risch and Cardin–three Democrats and three Republicans–introduced the bill as “a first step toward comprehensive reform of U.S. foreign assistance,” showing they are ready, willing and able to work with the administration on a set of deeper reforms. Read More…

8 Comments »

 

July 23, 2009

Special Op-Ed From Senator Lugar: Strong Voice for Development Needed

By Sheila Herrling

Senator LugarCGD was delighted to be asked by Senator Richard Lugar to post his op-ed on the urgent need to elevate global development and strengthen U.S. foreign assistance programs. Together with Senators Kerry, Menendez and Corker, Lugar plans to introduce legislation this month that bolsters USAID and promotes capacity, accountability and transparency in U.S. foreign assistance programs. He says a strong, independent foreign aid agency is critical to our long-term security and urges the Obama administration to support the forthcoming, bipartisan Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act. The full text of his op-ed follows:

 

[UPDATE 7/28/09: Today, Sens. Kerry, Lugar, Menendez, Corker, Risch, and Cardin introduced the Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act of 2009, bill number S. 1524 available here: ]

 

Read More…

14 Comments »

 

July 13, 2009

State Department Launches Inaugural Review of Diplomacy and Development

By Sheila Herrling

Hillary ClintonLast Friday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that she would undertake the first ever, and she hopes forever mandated, Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR). Presumably fashioned as a partner piece to the Defense Department’s Quadrennial Defense Review, the press release says the QDDR will: Read More…

4 Comments »

 

July 6, 2009

Honduras: Walks Like a Coup, Quacks Like a Coup, But Not Officially Called a Coup?

By Sheila Herrling

On June 28, after months of tension over Honduran President Manuel Zelaya’s plan to lift presidential term limits, armed soldiers hauled him in his pajamas out of his home and put him on a plane to Costa Rica. Looks like a coup to me. Later that day the Honduran Congress voted to remove Zelaya and swear in Roberto Micheletti, head of the Congress, as the new civilian president. Even so, it still sounds like a coup to me. So, all the news stories call it a coup. President Obama called it a coup. The OAS called it a coup in their official statement suspending Honduras’ membership from the regional organization. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the situation has “evolved into a coup.” Read More…

1 Comment »

 

April 30, 2009

Two Tails Wagging, Where’s the Dog?

By Sheila Herrling

After raising expectations both on the Obama campaign trail and during the transition period that development would really not just rhetorically be a priority and an equal partner with diplomacy and defense in our national security apparatus, two notable actions occurred this week, just under the 100 day mark. Read More…

Comment »

 

March 30, 2009

Dear General Jones: Add the USAID Administrator to the National Security Council

By Sheila Herrling

Last week, I sent a policy memo to the White House recommending they amend Presidential Policy Directive 1 (PPD-1) which sets out the organization and membership of the National Security Council, to add the USAID Administrator.  Why?  Three main reasons:

1.  It puts real action to the Obama campaign pledge and, most recently its new Afghanistan and Pakistan strategy,  to elevate development in U.S. national security and foreign policy.

2.  It is an actionable step to give development a distinct voice at the highest government decionmaking body.  This doesn’t ensure that the development view will always win, but it does allow for it to be heard distinct from the diplomatic political views typically weighing most heavily on the Secretary of State.

3.  It may help to recruit the calibre of USAID Administrator necessary to overhaul USAID and lead U.S. development policy inter-agency and globally.

Expectations were set high for serious action on and elevation of the development agenda during the campaign.  Having served on the foreign assistance agency review team during transition, I can personally attest to this.  Now, reality often gets in the way of the best of intentions, and certainly the financial crisis, the immediacy of the budget(s) and the sheer chore of setting up a new administration have been distractions from the development agenda.   But by making the USAID Administrator part of the NSC and executing the three following supporting actions (also covered in the policy memo to General Jones) the White House could put the agenda back on track :

1.  Appoint a strong USAID Administrator ASAP.  The agency needs a strong leader at the helm to work hand in hand with Secretary Clinton on development policy and to re-professionalize the organization.  The past four administrations had their USAID Administrators in place by May at the latest; Reagan had Peter McPherson confirmed February 1st.

2.  The NSC — not any individual government agency — should lead an interagency effort to craft a National Strategy for Global Development. 

3.  Signal to Congress its willingness to support their efforts to rewrite the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to reflect today’s needs.

1 Comment »

 

February 27, 2009

Obama FY10 Budget Charts Course to Doubling Aid

By Sheila Herrling

Yesterday, the Obama Administration released top-line numbers of its FY10 budget request. Of the whopping $3.6 trillion budget, $51.7 billion was allotted to the International Affairs Budget, an estimated 9.5% above the comparable amount for FY09. Note, however, that defining “comparable” is a bit tough this year because the Administration’s proposal brought all recurring spending (including that for Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan that has for years been funded through supplementals) into the base budget, stopping what had become a very bad practice. Our colleagues at the U.S. Global Leadership Campaign do a great job, as they do every year, of walking readers through a comparison.
Read More…

Comment »

 

February 9, 2009

A Foreign Assistance Act for the 21st Century

By Sheila Herrling

Many of you have asked why my Q&A on rewriting the Foreign Assistance Act was not a blog so you could offer commentary. Your wishes are my command — I would love to see your thoughts.

Comment »

 

October 22, 2008

Phoenix Rising: A Stunning Week of Calls to Elevate Development and Modernize Foreign Assistance

By Sheila Herrling

From the ashes of the global economic crisis, rose a stunning number of calls this week to avoid U.S. protectionism and isolationism through sustained engagement in international development initiatives and efforts to modernize foreign assistance.

Read More…

Comment »

 

October 14, 2008

Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) Goes Live: Join the Cause!

By Sheila Herrling

The Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) just launched its new website. As many of you know, CGD’s Steve Radelet is co-chair of this initiative. The new site provides information on how foreign assistance is in our national interest, why it is vital to modernize the current system, and how you can get involved in the effort.

Read More…

Comment »

 

June 16, 2008

Operation Smart Power: The Non-Military Surge We Need

By Sheila Herrling

The day after the launch of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network’s New Day, New Way Proposal, Representatives Betty McCollum (D-MN), Christopher Shays (R-CT), John Tierney (D-MA) and Frank Wolf (R-VA) introduced a bipartisan resolution to elevate global development and foreign assistance in our national interest. Continuing to build on the surge of momentum for modernizing U.S. foreign assistance, ten cosponsors of the resolution call on their colleagues to recognize that:

Read More…

1 Comment »

 

April 28, 2008

Congressional Hearing Highlights Growing Consensus for Retooling U.S. Foreign Assistance

By Sheila Herrling

Rep. Howard Berman, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, opened the first of a series of hearings on foreign assistance reform with a bold statement last Wednesday calling for major overhaul of the system. Says Berman:

It is painfully obvious to Congress, the Administration, foreign aid experts, and NGOs alike, that our foreign assistance program is fragmented and broken and in critical need of overhaul. I strongly believe that America’s foreign assistance program is not in need of some minor changes, but, rather, it needs to be reinvented and retooled in order to respond to the significant challenges our country and the world faces in the 21st century.

Read More…

1 Comment »

 

February 4, 2008

Henrietta Fore Announces Plan to Overhaul U.S. Foreign Assistance

By Sheila Herrling

On Friday, USAID Administrator and Director of U.S. Foreign Assistance Henrietta Fore unveiled to a standing-room-only CGD audience her much-awaited strategy for revitalizing our outdated foreign assistance apparatus in a speech titled Foreign Assistance: An Agenda for Reform. Four major actions drive her modernization plan:

  • Increasing the foreign assistance budget to meet the challenges of the 21st century to ensure “that development is an equal and essential element of our national security strategy and budget”;
  • Rebuilding the capacity of USAID — the FY09 budget released today requests the largest personnel increase ever, a doubling of the USAID training budget and a “surge capacity” to respond rapidly in crisis situations;
  • Streamlining budget and planning processes, with a shifting of emphasis to the field; and
  • Reestablishing U.S. intellectual leadership on foreign assistance.

Read More…

2 Comments »

 

January 18, 2008

Pentagon Chief Robert Gates Calls for More Resources, New Approach to Development

By Sheila Herrling

*This is a joint post with Steve Radelet
Defense Secretary Robert Gates -- Getty ImagesYesterday in an interview with NPR, Defense Secretary Robert Gates made a strong and smart argument for supporting American troops. No surprises there, right? Except for the fact that he is defending the build-up of civilian troops — our diplomatic and development corps — to be America’s front line of defense in fighting global poverty and insecurity. Much as he did in his brilliant speech at Kansas State University in November, Gates encourages the United States to devote more resources and create new institutions for nonmilitary means of influence abroad: diplomacy, strategic communications, foreign assistance, civic action, and economic reconstruction and development. His message:

If we are to meet the myriad challenges around the world in the coming decades, this country must strengthen other important elements of national power both institutionally and financially, and create the capability to integrate and apply all of the elements of national power to problems and challenges abroad.

And, how specifically do we elevate global development policy in the national interest? Says Gates:

What is clear to me is that there is a need for a dramatic increase in spending on the civilian instruments of national security — diplomacy, strategic communications, foreign assistance, civic action, and economic reconstruction and development….The way to institutionalize these capabilities is probably not to recreate or repopulate institutions of the past such as AID or USIA. On the other hand, just adding more people to existing government departments such as Agriculture, Treasury, Commerce, Justice and so on is not a sufficient answer either — even if they were to be more deployable overseas. New institutions are needed for the 21st century, new organizations with a 21st century mind-set.

Read More…

Comment »

 

December 12, 2007

Beyond the HELP Commission

By Sheila Herrling

*This is a joint post with Sarah Jane Hise
On Monday, the HELP Commission released its much-anticipated final report, “Beyond Assistance.” The Commission, created by an Act of Congress spearheaded by Congressman Wolf (R-VA) in January 2004, certainly achieved its mission — to conduct a thorough review of current U.S. foreign assistance efforts and make bold recommendations for mechanisms, structures and incentives to empower recipients and meet U.S. national security and foreign policy goals and objectives. The fact that such a diverse group of political and other interests could agree that foreign assistance is vital to U.S. interests but is broken and needs to be rebuilt in a way that elevates development to more equal footing with diplomacy and defense is music to our ears. As were most of the guiding principles and specific recommendations put forth by the Commission, including:

  • consolidating the disarray of organizations, purposes and accounts of assistance;
  • rewriting the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to establish a new compact on foreign assistance;
  • enhancing policy coherence, particularly by aligning U.S. trade and development policies;
  • increasing resources — staff, management training, and budget — for foreign aid;
  • ring-fencing long-term development assistance from redirection to short-term security and policy needs;
  • encouraging greater investment in economic growth, agriculture and infrastructure programs;
  • removing trade restrictions that hamper development, including reducing U.S. agricultural subsidies and providing duty-free/quota-free access for Millennium Challenge Account countries and for countries with $2000 per capita GDP;
  • reestablishing an independent Office of Monitoring and Evaluation to track performance and report results; and
  • instituting a Quadrennial Development and Humanitarian Assistance Review.

Read More…

Comment »

 

May 8, 2007

Administration Moves Quickly to Fill Behind Tobias

By Sheila Herrling

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice appointed Undersecretary of Management Henrietta Holsman Fore as acting Director of Foreign Assistance. The White House announced that the President has designated Ms. Fore acting USAID Administrator and his intent to nominate her for that post.
She’s got a big job ahead of her to move forward the Adminstration’s foreign aid reform agenda.

Comment »

 

April 27, 2007

Tobias Resigns: What Next for Foreign Aid Reform?

By Sheila Herrling

Today at 4:00 p.m., Randall Tobias officially resigned from the position of Director of Foreign Aid and Administrator of USAID for “personal reasons.” In the wake of this news folks are left wondering why he resigned and what happens to the foreign aid reform agenda he just launched. There appear to be two camps emerging on the “why”. Given the fact that very close aides to Tobias say they were shocked, — including Deputy USAID Administrator Jim Kunder who, in his email to staff says, “today I received shocking news…” — one camp believes it is truly very personal. Another camp notes that it was fairly common knowledge that Tobias did not plan on finishing out his term but that his decision to resign now was prompted by his fury over Congressman Tom Lantos’ infamous “We Are Not A Potted Plant” berating at a recent House International Affairs Committee hearing.
The more important question is what happens to the foreign aid reform agenda he launched just this year in real terms with the FY08 budget? Tobias’ resignation comes literally on the day the House turned its attention from the war supplemental bill to the foreign operations budget. And there’s a LOT of communication, demystification and outreach to key stakeholders that needs to happen to at least protect what is good in the foreign aid reform budget. With many foreign aid watchers already concerned with the subordination of long-term development investments to short-term political purposes and a centralization of decisionmaking in State that has marginalized USAID to date, putting Deputy Secretary of State Negroponte — now Acting Director of Foreign Assistance — as chief communicator on the issues may not be productive.
Join in the dialogue — what is the trajectory for moving foreign aid reform? What impact does Tobias’ resignation have (if any) on the FY08 foreign operations budget? What is possible in the last year before an Administration change?

7 Comments »

 

March 26, 2007

U.S. Foreign Aid Reform: Will The Congress Work for a Smart Power Budget?

By Sheila Herrling

Many readers of our piece last week on U.S. foreign aid reform, Billions for War, Pennies for the Poor: Moving the President’s FY2008 Budget from Hard Power to Smart Power, have asked for the state of play on Congressional mark-ups of the International Affairs budget itself. With a nod to the U.S. Global Leadership Campaign for their terrific up to date coverage, here’s where we’re at:
The Senate passed, by unanimous consent, an amendment led by Senators Smith and Dodd to restore $2.2 billion to the International Affairs Budget. The Senate completed its FY2008 Budget Resolution restoring the full FY08 president’s request of $36.5 billion. The full House Budget Resolution will be voted on this week, including what is now a $35.3 billion ($1.2 billion below the president’s request) International Affairs Budget. Passage of the House Budget resolution will be followed by a conference committee between the two chambers to work out differences between their bills.
And, in the midst of the budget debate, CSIS launches a Commission on Smart Power that aims to create a strategic vision for how the United States can integrate soft and hard power into “smart power” to address current and future challenges. Let us hope that the Congress doesn’t need the Commission report to be smart now about right-balancing our defense, diplomacy and development priorities.

Comment »