E-mail updates

Sign up to receive updates from CGD:

  
Buy CGD books

Global Health Policy

« Jack Valenti, 1921-2007, A Friend of the Fight | Main | Harnessing the Commercial Health Sector in Africa: The Devil is in the Details »

April 29, 2007

Chronic Diseases Hit Hard in Developing Countries

Posted by Rachel Nugent at 05:50 PM

Every week we hear of new strides against infectious disease: greater access to ARVs for poor country AIDS patients; more pledges of assistance from the G8; new therapies coming on-line from non-profit partnerships. Infectious diseases in poor countries are finally getting the attention and resources they deserve. However, it would be easy in all the attention given to infectious diseases to forget that the greatest mortality and illness in the world is now caused by chronic diseases. In every region of the world except sub-Saharan Africa (which is not far behind), the toll of chronic diseases - primarily cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, and cancer - outweighs that of infectious disease, and the burden is rising quickly. There are currently no Global Funds, no President's Emergency Plan, and no programs devoted to "Rolling Back" chronic diseases.

At a symposium on Monday, April 30, sponsored by Population Reference Bureau, I will join others in outlining the health and economic costs of chronic diseases, as well as describing some start-up efforts to address what many are calling the next "global epidemic." Presenters are Harvard epidemiologist Dr. Walter Willett, Sylvia Robles, World Bank, Denise Stevens of Yale and Matrix Public Health Associates, and myself. Please join us!

Trackback Ping

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/mt/mt-tb.cgi/851

Comments

I fully agree with the importance to pay more attention to non-communicable chronic diseases. But we have to do more 'to make the case'. Clearly the control of communicable diseses contributes more to achieving the MDG's. But is it known what the impact of non-communicable chronic diseases is on poverty (reduction) ? What is the economic story behind it ?
It will be difficult to loose the attention for the MDG's but resources and systems are needed also to deal with (the prevention !!) chonic diseases through lifestyles, environment and nutrition.

Ghana is currently in such position to have to deal with the triple burden of diseases: communicable diseases are still common, reproductive health is poor and non-communicable diseases are rapidly rising.

Yet it is not sure whether financial inputs into the sector will increase too.

Posted by: Marius W. de Jong at May 1, 2007 10:15 AM

Because of information I get from the newsletters of Doctors Without Borders, I know a little something about these horrendous chronic diseases that no one organization can effectively address except in certain areas. However, though the motive may not be altruistic, Exxon Mobil is attacking malaria in Indonesia and Africa on a huge scale. Maybe we need to approach other large corporations to "adopt" a disease or country, etc.

Posted by: Susan Loewenkamp at May 1, 2007 10:56 AM

Susan, I love your idea about getting companies to adopt-a-chronic-disease. Maybe even a competition for the company that makes the most progress in raising awareness or changing a specific behavior? Although we know such efforts can't solve the entire problem, chronic diseases in developing countries sorely need to be noticed in order for preventive behaviors to take place; and evidence suggests that companies can improve their bottom lines by promoting health in their own workforces.

Posted by: Rachel Nugent at May 15, 2007 11:39 AM

The spread of cardiovascular diseases to developing countries can be likened to that of a communicable disease. Global trade liberalisation and the globalisation of communications media and improved international transport allow cardiovascular risk factors to jump easily from one country to another. Spread amongst the newly-infected country depends on the rate at which newly-infected individuals infect others (shared socio-economic circumstances) and this depends on factors such as geographical homogeneity (urbanisation) and ease of transmission in a susceptible environment (high penetration of behavioural changes and acceptance), with some having a higher resistance to infection (lower socio-economic status) than others. The virulence of the organism (the high uptake and persistence of unhealthy behaviours) and slow recovery rate from infection (poor resources for prevention and control of cardiovascular disease) determine persistence of the disease in the new population, as does the long asymptomatic latent period. Cross-infection (already high levels of blood pressure in China and insulin resistance in South Asia) and lack of competition from protective factors (the social acceptance of obesity) increases the burden on particular countries.
Hence, when planning a control programmes for cardiovascular disease, all these aspects need to be taken into consideration. There is no vaccine...

Posted by: Justin Zaman at May 17, 2007 01:50 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)