Europe’s Unwelcome Export: Measles
December 29, 2011
You might have missed in early December the news reported by WHO on the raging measles outbreaks across Europe this year, despite the decline of measles globally. In 2011 France alone had 14,000+ cases of measles this year (see p. 559 and also here), the most in Europe, and Ireland’s Health Protection Surveillance Centre also just noted a 149% increase in measles cases.
Just how bad were the outbreaks in Europe this year? Using a WHO dataset, I plotted a few European countries with high numbers of cases, the United States, and a total for WHO Americas (which includes 35 countries in the Western hemisphere) before 2011. The chart below shows that the number of cases in WHO Americas fell rapidly in the 1990s and has stayed low. However in recent years, France, Germany and the UK have all reported more cases of the disease than the whole of the Americas. The number of cases in France from 2011, for example, would indicate that the country has fallen back to levels last seen in 2000 or earlier.
Measles is a leading cause of death among children today—some 164 thousand deaths globally in 2008—mainly in Africa and South Asia. In developing countries the case-fatality rate is estimated to be 3%-5% but may run up to 10%-30% in certain localities. One of the most highly communicable infectious diseases in the world, measles is believed to be one of the first to reappear when immunization coverage rates fall.
Europe’s insufficient coverage of measles immunization threatens not only Europeans. Most measles importations to the United States since 2005 have been from Europe (see p. 563), and that the incredible progress made by Latin America—which eliminated measles in 2002—is now threatened by Europe’s failure to vaccinate. The wealthy European countries that are spreading measles to the Americas are also staunch supporters of GAVI Alliance, which fights vaccine-preventable diseases. Perhaps European countries should consider the costs of exporting measles relative to their GAVI donations. Anyone from the Americas travelling to Europe should check to see that their measles immunization are up-to-date.
Why aren’t enough Europeans vaccinated? WHO lists ‘contributing factors’ (p. 561) that basically boil down to misinformation about the risks of measles vaccination sparked by a notorious 1998 article in the Lancet that erroneously suggested links between vaccination and autism. Though the article was retracted in 2010 (and there is no evidence on this linkage at all), it’s difficult to overcome more than a decade of incorrect knowledge. Many of those getting measles in Europe are those who were young children around the time the Wakefield article came out. More distressingly, several studies have found that a large share of European health workers do not support or even oppose vaccination. If knowledge about controlling infectious disease is a public good, then incorrect knowledge is truly a public ‘bad.’ Is misinformation more infectious than the diseases themselves?
To change knowledge and behavior, we need national commitments to address this challenge of increasing measles immunization coverage and reaching those who failed to get immunized in the past, combined with modern communications and marketing savvy to get the message out, particularly through physicians and health workers. Underpinning this should be a renewed commitment to public health surveillance and epidemic intelligence. Let’s hope that in 2012 Europe can get better on measles immunization, perhaps by learning from the Americas.
4 Responses to “Europe’s Unwelcome Export: Measles”
Post a Comment
We value frank and constructive exchanges and encourage you to use your real name in your comments.






December 29th, 2011 at 12:36 pm
Thank you Victoria for this informative article. It highlights the need for a dynamic disease surveillance system encompassing the southern and northern hemisphere as well. Using innovative mHealth technologies, which have proved effective in expanding vaccination coverage in a developing set up, Europe should not find it difficult to ensure universal coverage of measles vaccination. And, ofcourse, as suggested there needs to be a focused advocacy and communication strategy to improve the understanding of the importance of vaccination in disease prevention from a local and global perspective.
January 2nd, 2012 at 7:57 pm
I wonder why there is such a prevalent attitude against vaccinations, even among health workers, and why that 1998 Lancet article was so readily accepted by the public.
As you said, European governments should feel obligated to show commitment to immunization domestically as they do internationally if they are sincere about fighting disease. The irony (and injustice) is compounded by the way that immigration laws intersect with beliefs about disease control.
January 23rd, 2012 at 6:50 pm
Great post, Victoria. And frightening portent. One of the best things I’ve heard on this issue (people refusing to vaccinate their kids) was a radio piece on “The Panic Virus” – a book by Seth Mnookin. (http://n.pr/wRE2Ol). He studies the phenomenon in the U.S. and shows the negative role played by the media. The entire attitude toward evidence in social debates is also changing with the internet. Even if the Lancet hadn’t published that article, something like it could easily be posted and go viral on the web. We need to address public attitudes toward vaccination as part of the intervention; otherwise this kind of story is going to come back to haunt us for all kinds of vaccine preventable diseases.
January 23rd, 2012 at 9:37 pm
Thanks Bill for your kind words and the great reference. For others here’s the link to the NPR radio interview: http://n.pr/ehvxdc. I find it particularly disturbing that there is a large number of health workers, such as doctors who do not have a position on, or even oppose, vaccines. If even the doctors are confused about the genuine benefits and risks of vaccines, then surely there is something not right in how scientific information is transmitted to general knowledge.