Print
Share
Saving Lives by Counting Deaths
February 6, 2012
A recent study from the Lancet says that malaria caused 1.24 million deaths in 2010 (compared to previous estimates of 655,000), suggesting that the number of deaths from malaria globally may be twice as large as previously believed. Needless to say, this new finding is making headlines and bringing renewed attention to malaria as a central focus of global health efforts.
Estimating disease burden is important for budget and resource allocation—and in the case of malaria it has been done many times before. The Lancet study cites 14 different estimates for malaria burden, noting the “highly variable results” of this research. So perhaps the best question to ask is how these results could be so different? How could over half a million more people be dying from malaria annually without us knowing about it?
For the most part, the development community is largely in the dark when it comes to knowing who lives and dies, where, and why. The methods of this new study (as with many studies that estimate disease burden) relied on data based from vital statistics registries and verbal autopsy results. But in many malaria endemic countries, these systems offer low coverage and poor quality—leaving the vast majority of deaths poorly-coded or never documented in the first place.
For instance, from 1995-2004 the proportion of the population living in countries with complete death registrations in Africa, South-East Asia, and the Western Pacific was 7%, 1%, and 13% respectively (see here) and only half of the countries in Africa and South Asia even record cause of death data. In Africa, only the islands of Mauritius and the Seychelles currently have complete registration of births, deaths, and cause of death.
In the absence of complete information, researchers must model their estimates based on what data they have access to, even if poorly coded cause-of-death data and low sample sizes result in high levels of uncertainty. Accurate information on cause of death—and other vital events—is essential for understanding disease burden, influencing policy, and determining resource allocation. In the case of malaria, knowing how people are dying can save lives by allowing funders and governments to understand the true burden of disease and enabling them to realign their priorities and scale up programs. Still, an empirical evidence base for global health resource allocation will be absent as long as the vast majority of causes of deaths go unrecorded or miscoded.
Possibly Related Posts
One Response to “Saving Lives by Counting Deaths”
Post a Comment
We value frank and constructive exchanges and encourage you to use your real name in your comments.
February 24th, 2012 at 9:24 am
Supporting countries to count births and deaths and to record causes of deaths through civil registration is a key aspect of the Health Metrics Network’s mission.
o The Health Metrics Network has supported the development of low cost approaches, such as a ‘verbal autopsy’, a questionnaire that helps communities to record the cause of death when someone dies at home.
o HMN is catalysing innovation such as supporting communities to use mobile phones to record births and deaths.
o The Health Metrics Network is the focal point for the United Nations Commission on Information and Accountability for Women’s and Children’s Health to work with partners to accelerate the progress of 75 high burden target countries in strengthening their systems for the registration of births, deaths, causes of death, and pregnancy data.
The Health Metrics Network is working closely with UNESCAP and UNECA to accelerate progress in high burden countries in Asia and Africa. We welcome blogs like this that bring public attention to the “scandal of invisibility.”