Print
Share
Helping Pakistan Help Itself: Why America Should Open Its Markets (Not Just its Purse) to Pakistan
August 26, 2010
This is a joint post with Molly Kinder.
The United States and the international community have finally begun to open their wallets and provide humanitarian aid to help Pakistan’s flood victims, but that is just the beginning. To help Pakistan rebuild and create jobs for the millions displaced, the United States could do far more by fully opening its market to Pakistani exports.
Last week, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon , Secretary Clinton, and other world leaders beseeched the international community to do more to help Pakistan cope with its catastrophic floods. With donor contributions initially trickling in at anemic levels, newspaper headlines questioned why the world seemed not to care about Pakistan’s humanitarian disaster. Under pressure, donors at last responded and the relief effort seems to have finally found its legs. By early this week, donor commitments had nearly quadrupled to $800 million.
Yet despite this rise in charitable giving, Pakistan’s needs are nowhere near met. This week a team of donors from the ADB and World Bank are in Pakistan to assess the damage to Pakistan’s flood-affected regions. The price tag they will announce for the cost of rebuilding will be nothing short of staggering. The Wall Street Journal reports that the damage could reach $43 billion and could leave a “long term mark on the economy.” Nearly 2 million acres of crops have been damaged and economic growth could be slowed by as much as one or two percentage points. Cotton output is expected to shrink more than 15 percent, threatening Pakistan’s textile industry – one of Pakistan’s major sources of export income. Even if the U.S. repurposes the entire $1.5 billion in aid it had already committed to Pakistan’s development for this year, the future of Pakistan’s flood affected regions – and U.S. national security – will still hang in the balance.
Given the mammoth rebuilding challenge in Pakistan, the economic losses, and the high stakes for U.S. interests, the United States should use every tool at its disposal to support a swift, effective recovery in Pakistan. Yet ironically, the single most powerful and inexpensive tool is precisely the one the United States has failed to leverage: fully opening its markets to Pakistan’s exports. Were Congress to step up and pass legislation to slash or eliminate tariffs for all Pakistani goods, including apparel and textiles, this would create jobs for those fleeing devastated homes in the countryside and looking for relief in the cities– at virtually no cost to American taxpayers, and without any risk of misspent funds and corruption.
The New York Times captured well this win-win-win situation in an editorial last week, whose message we heartily applaud:
Reducing or eliminating tariffs costs the American taxpayer nothing, lowers consumer prices here and the benefits would flow directly into the Pakistani civilian economy where it is desperately needed.
As the New York Times points out, the key for meaningful Congressional legislation is to include the Pakistani products that are actually competitive, especially textiles and apparel, a sector which employs some 3.5 million people and provides one of the few opportunities for women outside of agriculture.
Until now, textiles and apparel accounted for 60 percent of Pakistan’s total exports and 40 percent of its manufacturing jobs. The industry is sure to be staggered by the floods, which washed away 20 percent of the annual cotton crop and destroyed major power stations that supply electricity to factories. Reviving this industry is critical to Pakistan’s hopes for future stability and prosperity.
Unfortunately, as the editorial notes and as one of us concluded in a recent CGD note, current trade legislation pending in Congress falls far short. The legislation, which would allow selected duty-free imports from the tribal regions in Pakistan, was purely symbolic even before the floods, because it excluded half of Pakistani products (especially clothing) and because of the lack of security and infrastructure in those areas. We agree with the Times, and the members of the CGD study group on a U.S. Development Strategy in Pakistan, that a serious response that is commensurate with U.S. national security interests in Pakistan and with the human tragedy occurring there requires fully opening the U.S. market to all exports from all parts of Pakistan. Doing so might increase Pakistani exports of textiles and apparel by 50 percent or more, rather than approximately zero as would be likely under the current legislation.
Of course, when we mention this proposal, we often hear: “You’re right, that would be great, but the U.S. textile industry will never let that happen.” This is nonsense. Surely the over-riding U.S. national interest in Pakistan’s stability and growth should trump the imaginary concerns of lobbyists representing a tiny segment of the U.S. economy, whose interests will hardly be affected by this important legislation. U.S. imports of textiles and apparel from Pakistan are only 3 percent of the total and do not compete directly with U.S. producers. We therefore agree with the New York Times that while “American companies, and their Congressional supporters, will scream at easing tariffs….they should not be allowed to trump America’s national security interest.”
Doing the right thing in this case would be a big boost in helping Pakistan recover, with little or no cost to American taxpayers, to workers, or to the budget deficit. The right question then is not why should the United States open its markets to Pakistan. Rather, the burning question to Congress and the administration is: how could the United States not?
Possibly Related Posts
- Why America Needs to Ramp Up Aid to Pakistan
- Beyond Gestures: A Trade Bill That Will Make a Real Difference in Pakistan
- A Long-Term Fix for Pakistan’s Energy Woes
3 Responses to “Helping Pakistan Help Itself: Why America Should Open Its Markets (Not Just its Purse) to Pakistan”
Post a Comment
We value frank and constructive exchanges and encourage you to use your real name in your comments.
August 30th, 2010 at 2:24 pm
This is an excellent article. This is one of the most burning issues that market access to both US and Europe is being denied to developing countries such as Pakistan under the pretext of War on Terror or other political and legal glitches. The best way to support development is to trade with a country that has a potential to produce goods and render services on prescribed quality. Its a win-win situation for both. The punch line has been for many of us: Trade NOT aid (with few exceptions of-course).
September 1st, 2010 at 4:12 pm
I’m a resident of Sukkur in Pakistan. This town at present is the epic center of activity for the rehabilitation of the flood affected people because of its close proximity of flood affected area in the Sindh province and this town also host the largest irrigation network on the Indus River through its barrage.
I would like to bring your attention to the activities of the NGOs and government towards the flood effected areas and the effectives. No doubt after so much hue any cry of the government funds are pouring in from the donor countries through their selective agencies (which further hire local NGOs for action on ground) there is so much activity on the ground but I only see cars, laptops, properties on rent and rented cars travelling here and there on the roads. But I haven’t seen anything that would suggest to me that their activities are making any difference for the people. Their intensions no doubt are for helping people but there are some serious flaws in the execution of their services. Our Prime Minister also raised this issue in his recent press conference that handsome amount of donated money will go for sustaining those agencies staff rather than for the betterment of affected people. I am not advocating on behalf of the government it is their bad performance in the past that lead to this much trust deficit on government. Unjustified local media speculation which has its own ulterior motives to malign the present government performance further damaged the credibility of government.
I very much praise the article about Pakistan that was co-authored by you (Helping Pakistan Help Itself). The actual focus should be on the long term stability of Pakistan both socially and economically and it is only possible if the economy of Pakistan is strengthened by giving it ample opportunities to compete with international players in the field of trade and commerce. During the last government of General (President) Musharraf, US poured in billions of dollars which stabilized the fiscal position of Pakistan and gave confidence to international investors. But ironically they only invested in the service sector (telecommunication, banking, stock market, property) which did bring good employment opportunities but failed to provide long term employment. Since Pakistan is still an agro based economy, investment should be brought into agriculture based businesses. At present Pakistan’s industrial growth is in negative due to energy deficiency, tough international competition. Textile, leather, sports good is the hardest hit sector which is backbone of Pakistani industry.
Its hard to predict what will be the fallout of the floods on Pakistan economy, too much damaged has been suffered by the energy sector especially in the Northern Province along with transportation infrastructure, further south in Punjab and Sindh the bread basket of Pakistan – millions of acres of crops submerged under water – shortage and surge in prices of food items are possible in near future.
Pakistan at any cost must improve its revenue collection system in the long run. Out of the population of 170 million people hardly 2.5 million pay the direct taxes; overhaul of the taxation system is need on the urgent basis to improve the fiscal condition of the exchequer. Many sectors of economy are outside the net of taxation instead of bringing them within, government take a short term decision and put further pressure on tax payers to increase their revenue, which leads to corruption.
Think tanks like yours should emphasis on policies that will help Pakistan right from the grassroots level with long lasting benefits for “have not’s”. No doubt IMF, WB, ADB etc are always comes to help Pakistan but it was never beneficial for those who needed their help the most. With over 50 billion dollar debt it becomes very difficult for Pakistan to enhance its social sector development.
September 17th, 2010 at 7:43 am
Very good article, Kimberly and Molly. Also very informative and thoughtful responses, Hina and Sikander. The US and other countries should certainly continue their current aid response to the disaster. It is certainly a win/win situation for the US and other countries to fully open markets to Pakistan’s exports. Expanded export abilities would allow Pakistan’s businesses, large and small, to provide jobs to people who desperately need sustainable options now…and Pakistan, itself, can begin to rebuild the economy from within.